From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of New York.
Apr 26, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3233 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-26

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Latisha BOWDEN, Appellant.

Legal Aid Society, New York City (Michael J. McLaughlin, Richard Joselson and Steven Banks of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Stanley R. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.


Legal Aid Society, New York City (Michael J. McLaughlin, Richard Joselson and Steven Banks of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Stanley R. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90[2][a] ).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of New York.
Apr 26, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3233 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Bowden

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Latisha BOWDEN, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3233 (N.Y. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3233
944 N.Y.S.2d 753
967 N.E.2d 1198

Citing Cases

People v. Dunbar

Contrary to defendant's assertion, the fact that the bag was no longer within his immediate reach at the time…

People v. Dunbar

Contrary to defendant's assertion, the fact that the bag was no longer within his immediate reach at the time…