From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 2003
1 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2000-01692

Submitted October 2, 2003.

November 10, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered February 10, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record of the plea proceeding reflects that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary ( see People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit ( see People v. Hickman, 276 A.D.2d 563, 564; People v. Mann, 258 A.D.2d 738, 739).

SMITH, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Boston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 2003
1 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Boston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ALFONSO BOSTON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 894

Citing Cases

People v. Donigan

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. A review of the plea proceeding reflects that the defendant's waivers…