From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bostic

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 25, 2015
125 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

02-25-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Darryl BOSTIC, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed May 18, 2011, upon his conviction of attempted arson in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal does not bar review of the sentence that was ultimately imposed (see People v. Maracle, 19 N.Y.3d 925, 927, 950 N.Y.S.2d 498, 973 N.E.2d 1272 ; People v. Arney, 120 A.D.3d 949, 990 N.Y.S.2d 752 ). Nonetheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bostic

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 25, 2015
125 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Bostic

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Darryl BOSTIC, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 25, 2015

Citations

125 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
1 N.Y.S.3d 867

Citing Cases

People v. Ritorto

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid,…

People v. Ritorto

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid,…