From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Borland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

723 KA 19-00209

10-01-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kyle L. BORLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the third degree ( Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.20 ). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal "is not enforceable inasmuch as the totality of the circumstances fails to reveal that defendant ‘understood the nature of the appellate rights being waived’ " ( People v. Youngs , 183 A.D.3d 1228, 1228, 121 N.Y.S.3d 701 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1050, 127 N.Y.S.3d 826, 151 N.E.3d 507 [2020], quoting People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 559, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]). Nevertheless, we affirm. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently entered inasmuch as he did not move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Turner , 175 A.D.3d 1783, 1784, 109 N.Y.S.3d 528 [4th Dept. 2019], lv denied 34 N.Y.3d 1082, 116 N.Y.S.3d 177, 139 N.E.3d 835 [2019] ), and we conclude that this case does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation rule set forth in People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666-667, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988]. Further, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Borland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Borland

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kyle L. BORLAND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
198 A.D.3d 1317