From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Booth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 31, 1966
216 N.E.2d 615 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1966

Decided March 31, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. SARAFITE, J.

Phylis Skloot Bamberger, Matthew Muraskin and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Michael R. Stack and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed. In our opinion the trial court was correct in denying the writ of error coram nobis until petitioner's sanity is restored (see People v. Cossentino, 14 N.Y.2d 750).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING. Judge FULD dissents in the following memorandum: I do not believe that a defendant's mental condition disables him from seeking coram nobis relief. (Cf. Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107.) I would reverse and remand for a hearing on the merits.


Summaries of

People v. Booth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 31, 1966
216 N.E.2d 615 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

People v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH BOOTH, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 31, 1966

Citations

216 N.E.2d 615 (N.Y. 1966)
216 N.E.2d 615
269 N.Y.S.2d 457

Citing Cases

People v. Aponte

These cases present the question whether a prisoner who has been certified to Dannemora State Hospital as…

United States ex Rel. Schuster v. Herold

Finally as the court below stated, prisoners held in Dannemora are in practice not even called for hearing by…