Opinion
June 15, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred H. Kleiman, J.).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), defendant's guilt of the crime charged was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). The jury's determinations of credibility and fact, supported by the record, will not be disturbed by this Court (People v. Gruttola, 43 N.Y.2d 116, 122).
We note that defendant's claim on appeal that the trial court "refused" to hold a hearing regarding the People's application for a limited protective order in connection with certain civilian witnesses is belied by the record, and his related claims of error are unpreserved by appropriate and timely objection for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05). In any event, we find that the trial court appropriately exercised its discretionary power to permit delayed discovery of the names and/or redact the addresses of witnesses who might face intimidation (People v. Guzman, 176 A.D.2d 561, 562, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 920).
We have considered defendant's additional claims of error and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Milonas, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.