Further, defendant's sentence was well below the maximum permissible sentence for this violent felony (see Penal Law ยงยง 70.06 [6] [b]; 140.25 [1] [b]), and, given his continued course of conduct against the victim, we perceive no extraordinary circumstances or abuse of discretion that would warrant a modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Grimes, 195 A.D.3d 1245, 1246 [2021]; People v Hockenbury, 190 A.D.3d at 1156-1157; People v Mattucci, 92 A.D.3d at 1030). Finally, defendant's claim that the court relied on improper information when sentencing him is unpreserved as defendant did not object on this ground at sentencing (see People v Tittensor, 197 A.D.3d 1356, 1357 [2021], lvs denied 37 N.Y.3d 1095, 1099 [2021]; People v Boone, 192 A.D.3d 905, 905 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 954 [2021]; People v Metellus, 46 A.D.3d 578, 579 [2007], lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 814 [2008]). Egan Jr., J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.