From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bookard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-01602.

December 22, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered January 24, 2008, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum and Alice Paszel on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially, we note that the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was not valid ( see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered ( see People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869, 870; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Grimes, 35 AD3d 882, 883). The defendant affirmatively stated, in response to the court's questions at his plea allocution, that he understood every inquiry regarding the nature of the proceedings and his relinquishment of the rights in connection therewith. The defendant agreed to the plea bargain and did so voluntarily, with a full appreciation of the consequences, and upon the competent advice of counsel.

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Bookard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Bookard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE BOOKARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9670
890 N.Y.S.2d 343

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (…

People v. Madison

Here, however, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his plea of guilty…