From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bolden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

noting the general rule that a person engaged in mutual combat may not claim self-defense

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Woodford

Opinion

October 21, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (La Buda, J.).


Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 5 to 10 years in accordance with the plea agreement. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that no nonfrivolous issues can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel's brief, we agree. We accordingly affirm the judgment of conviction and grant defense counsel's application to withdraw (see, People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650).

MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, SPAIN, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.


Summaries of

People v. Bolden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

noting the general rule that a person engaged in mutual combat may not claim self-defense

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Woodford
Case details for

People v. Bolden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANN BOLDEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Woodford

He only makes the more modest claim that they had a "shoot-out" and he won. People v. Bolden, 71 Cal.App.4th…

People v. Harris

        The People ask this court to modify the judgment to impose a mandatory and separate $200 parole…