Opinion
2012–09425 Ind.No. 7455/10
10-03-2018
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David BODRICK, appellant.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Masha Siminova on the memorandum), for respondent.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Masha Siminova on the memorandum), for respondent.
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., REINALDO E. RIVERA, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, BETSY BARROS, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), imposed September 16, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Rance, 122 A.D.3d 949, 995 N.Y.S.2d 680 ) precludes appellate review of his contention that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive (see People v. Cooper, 155 A.D.3d 766, 63 N.Y.S.3d 251 ; People v. Blas, 120 A.D.3d 585, 990 N.Y.S.2d 826 ).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, AUSTIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.