From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8346.

April 25, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J., on motions; Robert H. Straus, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered May 27, 2004, convicting defendant of attempted assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Deborah L. Morse of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's initial and renewed speedy trial motions. The record supports the court's findings that the periods from March 24 to April 7, and June 12 to September 25, 2003 were "reasonable period[s] of delay" (CPL 30.30 [a]), resulting from proceedings related to defendant's efforts to present a psychiatric defense and the People's subsequent efforts to conduct their own psychiatric examination of defendant and to have a report prepared ( see People v. Jackson, 267 AD2d 183, lv denied 94 NY2d 949). We note that the People were not obligated to hire an expert and make preparations to rebut a psychiatric defense during a period in which legal issues as to whether defendant would be permitted to interpose such a defense were being resolved.


Summaries of

People v. Boda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Boda

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERNEST BODA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3023
813 N.Y.S.2d 89

Citing Cases

People v. Woodard

Defendant claims that the delay in providing County Court with the grand jury minutes was chargeable to the…