From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blocker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 20, 2014
120 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-08-20

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bruce BLOCKER, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Janet Claire Lê of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Janet Claire Lê of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Modica, J.), imposed November 4, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). ENG, P.J., MASTRO, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Blocker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 20, 2014
120 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Blocker

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bruce BLOCKER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5893
990 N.Y.S.2d 888