From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant seeks to have his conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree dismissed on the ground that it is an inclusory concurrent count of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree ( see, CPL 300.40 [b]). However, his plea of guilty forecloses him from raising this claim ( see, People v. Walton, 41 N.Y.2d 880).

There is no indication in the record that the defendant applied at the conclusion of his term of imprisonment for resentencing pursuant to CPL 420.10 (5) on the basis that payment of the mandatory surcharge would "work an unreasonable hardship" (CPL 420.35). Therefore, the defendant's claim that the mandatory surcharge should be waived is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Teele, 157 A.D.2d 592; People v. Carlton, 133 A.D.2d 776).

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Bliss

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK BLISS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 461

Citing Cases

People v. Martinez

In any event, the facts admitted by the defendant during his plea allocution were sufficient to support his…

People v. Dean

We reject defendant's contention that the second through ninth counts of the indictment are inclusory…