Opinion
May 2, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to raise his objection to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not preserved his claim for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). A reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted under the circumstances (see, People v Kruger, 132 A.D.2d 624, 625; People v Burnett, 105 A.D.2d 710; People v Ebron, 87 A.D.2d 653). Moreover, the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is premised on factual allegations not contained in the record, thereby precluding appellate review (see, People v Batts, 96 A.D.2d 842).
Finally, the defendant's sentence was not excessive under the circumstances. Mangano, J.P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.