From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bissoon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2012
100 A.D.3d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-21

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rodger BISSOON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stending of counsel), for appellant. *899Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stending of counsel), for appellant. *899Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed February 18, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 735, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46;People v. Foy, 89 A.D.3d 1103, 1103, 933 N.Y.S.2d 599;People v. Pertillar, 37 A.D.3d 740, 831 N.Y.S.2d 212).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bissoon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2012
100 A.D.3d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Bissoon

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rodger BISSOON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8025
953 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Jacobs

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant validly waived his right to appeal ( see People v.…