From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bispo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 25, 2009
65 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02407.

August 25, 2009.

Appeal by the People from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), imposed February 14, 2008, pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643, § 1), after a hearing, upon the defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Gary Fidel and Edward D. Saslaw of counsel), for appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Sarah J. Berger of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

As we have previously held in this matter, there is no merit to the People's contention that a defendant from whom a merit-time allowance has been withheld pursuant to Correction Law § 803 (1) (d) (iv) is not eligible for resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 ( see L 2005, ch 643, § 1; People v Bispo, 47 AD3d 641, 642; People v Sanders, 36 AD3d 944, 946; People v Quinones, 11 Misc 3d 582, 595-596; cf. People v Williams, 48 AD3d 858, 859-860; People v Paniagua, 45 AD3d 98).


Summaries of

People v. Bispo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 25, 2009
65 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Bispo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CASTANO BISPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6337
883 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

People v. Foxworth

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People may appeal from the resentence. The Legislature has…