From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bishop

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Shasta
Oct 18, 2007
No. C055173 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2007)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK JAMES BISHOP, Defendant and Appellant. C055173 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Shasta October 18, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 06F5964

DAVIS, J.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment.

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

Sixteen grass fires were set in the Shasta County area--eight between the dates of September 20 and September 25, 2005, and eight between the dates of July 12 and July 22, 2006. Defendant Mark James Bishop pleaded no contest to seven counts of arson of structure or forest land (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (c)) and admitted he had used a delayed ignition device in setting four of the fires (Pen. Code, § 451.1, subd. (a)(5)). He also admitted he had a prior strike conviction. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.) In exchange for his plea, nine additional counts and numerous special allegations were dismissed. Defendant also agreed to a stipulated sentence of 27 years in state prison.

The trial court sentenced defendant to the stipulated 27 years, imposed a restitution fine of $5,400, a $5,400 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked, and a $20 court security fee on each count. (Pen. Code, §§ 1202.4, subd. (b), 1202.45, 1465.8, subd. (a)(1).) Defendant was awarded 331 days custody credit (221 actual and 110 conduct). (Pen. Code, § 4019.) Defendant did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.)

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: BLEASE, Acting P.J., NICHOLSON, J.


Summaries of

People v. Bishop

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Shasta
Oct 18, 2007
No. C055173 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK JAMES BISHOP, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Shasta

Date published: Oct 18, 2007

Citations

No. C055173 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2007)