From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Birds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 1985
115 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 27, 1985

Appeal from the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.).


Defendant and two other codefendants were tried jointly. The jury returned the same verdict of guilty as to each defendant. The convictions of the codefendants were previously affirmed upon appeal to this court (see, People v Irving, 107 A.D.2d 944; People v Allsbrook, 105 A.D.2d 467, appeal dismissed 66 N.Y.2d 613). On this appeal, defendant contends that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that it was error to impose consecutive sentences under the circumstances of this case. Initially, we observe that the question of the sufficiency of the evidence was addressed on a prior appeal by a jointly tried codefendant and found to sustain the finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Irving, supra; see, People v Allsbrook, supra). We reach the same result in this case as to defendant. In addition, we find no error in the imposition of consecutive sentences for the commission of separate and distinct criminal offenses (see, People v Brathwaite, 63 N.Y.2d 839, 843; People v Irving, supra).

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.P., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Birds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 1985
115 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Birds

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IVAN L. BIRDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Gagnon

Equally unpersuasive is defendant's contention that the sentence, which was within the statutory parameters…