From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Binyon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2008
48 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-01591.

February 5, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), rendered January 9, 2006, convicting her of assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Chadbourne Parke LLP, New York, N.Y. [Thomas E. Butler and Marjory T. Herold] of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Rhea A. Grob, and Veronica J. Wiles of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Lifson, Covello and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying her request for a missing witness charge with respect to one of the complainants. The People established that the uncalled witness, who had left the country, was unavailable ( see People v Gonzalez 68 NY2d 424 [1986]; People v Benjamin, 210 AD2d 418; People v Ortega, 166 AD2d 728).


Summaries of

People v. Binyon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2008
48 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Binyon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JACQUELYN BINYON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1156
849 N.Y.S.2d 800

Citing Cases

People v. Reeves

The defendant's contention that the admission of certain DNA evidence at trial violated his rights under the…