From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Biggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 2000
268 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 20, 2000

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hemmett Jr., J.), rendered March 1, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

Theresa M. Suozzi, Albany, for appellant.

Robert M. Winn, District Attorney (Bertlen F. Turner of counsel), Fort Edward, for respondent.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, SPAIN, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hemmett Jr., J.), rendered March 1, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

In November 1998, defendant, a prison inmate, was indicted by a Grand Jury with one count of promoting prison contraband in the first degree and three counts of attempted assault in the second degree. In January 1999, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of attempted assault in the second degree in full satisfaction of the four-count indictment. It is noted, however, that prior to entering his plea of guilty, defendant, a second felony offender, was informed that the recommended sentence would be 2 to 4 years in prison. Defendant agreed to this recommendation and was thereafter sentenced to 2 to 4 years in prison to run consecutively with the sentence he was currently serving. Defendant now contends that the sentence he received was harsh and excessive.

We disagree. The record reveals that the sentence defendant received was in full accordance with his plea agreement. Furthermore, a review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion on the part of County Court in sentencing defendant to a prison term within the statutory parameters, nor do any extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant modification (see, People v. Hicks, 245 A.D.2d 979). These factors, together with defendant's prior criminal record, lead us to conclude that the sentence imposed was not harsh or excessive.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Biggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 2000
268 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH BIGGS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 713

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

In any event, were we to consider defendant's claim, we would find it to be without merit. We are also…

People v. Rivera

To the extent that they may be preserved, defendant's remaining contentions are also lacking in merit.…