From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bibbes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-9

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brandon BIBBES, Defendant–Appellant.


Motion for reargument of the appeal is granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered September 28, 2012 (98 A.D.3d 1267, 951 N.Y.S.2d 607) is amended by deleting the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of the memorandum and substituting the following sentence: “We reject defendant's further contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting a prosecution witness to testify that, on the day after the incident, defendant told her that he would ‘cap [the victim] and her daughter’ because he would not go to jail for a crime he did not commit, and that defendant then pulled up his shirt and revealed ‘like a little gun or something like that in his waist.’ ”

CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bibbes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Bibbes

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brandon BIBBES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7561
954 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Contrary to defendant's further contention, he was not denied effective assistance of counsel based on…

People v. McKoy

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his related contention that the court erred in failing to provide…