From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Betancur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 21, 1994
203 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 21, 1994

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.).


The record reveals that defendant's plea of guilty and waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and, as such, the negotiated plea will be enforced (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). There is no merit to defendant's contention that he was coerced to plead guilty to ensure a favorable plea bargain for his wife at the insistence of the prosecutor. The prosecutor was free to dictate the terms under which he would accept the guilty plea to a reduced crime (see, People v Antonio, 176 A.D.2d 528, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 824).

In view of this holding, it is unnecessary to review the denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence. Were we to do so, we would affirm that ruling as well.

Cardona, P.J., Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Betancur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 21, 1994
203 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Betancur

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FABER BETANCUR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 960

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Initially, we reject the contention that defendant's guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and…

People v. Millan

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently…