From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bertolini

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 5, 2020
186 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2016–08905 Ind. No. 1692/98

08-05-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Antonio BERTOLINI, Appellant.

Joseph W. Murray, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Brad Landau of counsel), for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan and Judith R. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.


Joseph W. Murray, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Brad Landau of counsel), for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan and Judith R. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, HECTOR D. LASALLE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Teresa K. Corrigan, J.), entered July 22, 2016, which, without a hearing, denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Jules E. Orenstein, J.), rendered December 15, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination to deny, without a hearing, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction. "In order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based upon the defense counsel's failure to adequately inform the defendant of a plea offer, the defendant has the burden of establishing that the People made the plea offer, that the defendant was not adequately informed of the offer, that there was a reasonable probability that the defendant would have accepted the offer had counsel adequately communicated it to him, and that there was a reasonable likelihood that neither the People nor the court would have blocked the alleged agreement" ( People v. Nicelli , 121 A.D.3d 1129, 1129–1130, 994 N.Y.S.2d 422, citing People v. Maldonado , 116 A.D.3d 980, 983 N.Y.S.2d 635 ; see Missouri v. Frye , 566 U.S. 134, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 ). "A defendant's self-serving statement, without more, is insufficient to establish such a claim" ( People v. Goldberg , 33 A.D.3d 1018, 1019, 823 N.Y.S.2d 492 ). Here, other that the defendant's self-serving affidavit claiming that his former attorney failed to convey a favorable plea offer to him, the defendant's claim was unsupported and, under the circumstances, there is no reasonable possibility that the defendant's allegations are true (see CPL 440.30[4][d] ; People v. Smiley , 67 A.D.3d 713, 714, 886 N.Y.S.2d 893 ; cf. People v. Goldberg , 33 A.D.3d at 1019–1020, 823 N.Y.S.2d 492 ).

MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bertolini

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 5, 2020
186 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Bertolini

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Antonio Bertolini…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 5, 2020

Citations

186 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
186 A.D.3d 499
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4402

Citing Cases

People v. Samms

Here, the defendant did not satisfy that burden. The Supreme Court found that the only competent evidence…

People v. Samms

Here, the defendant did not satisfy that burden. The Supreme Court found that the only competent evidence…