From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bernoff

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 10, 1944
54 N.E.2d 376 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued December 6, 1943

Decided March 10, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, WALLACE, J.

I. Maurice Wormser and Jacob W. Friedman for Jacob Bernoff and others, appellants. Thomas L.J. Corcoran and Arthur A. Klotz for Abraham Lichtenstein, appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Stanley H. Fuld, Alan J. Elliot and Harold Roland Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.


All of the appellants above named were found guilty of conspiracy to extort and of various separate crimes of extortion. We conclude that as to appellants Bernoff, McAdam, Gabaeff, Taylor, Green, Blume and Murphy, the evidence is sufficient on all the counts on which they were found guilty and that there were no serious errors on the trial. As to appellants Lichtenstein and Buckley, however, we come to a different conclusion. As to appellant Lichtenstein there was no sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice Kennedy and as to appellant Buckley there is no sufficient showing that he knowingly joined the conspiracy or knowingly did anything to further it, or that he was guilty of any of the alleged acts of extortion.

As to the defendants Abraham Lichtenstein and Jeremiah Buckley the judgment should be reversed and the indictment dismissed as to them; as to the other defendants, the judgment should be affirmed. (See 292 N.Y. 642.)

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

People v. Bernoff

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 10, 1944
54 N.E.2d 376 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

People v. Bernoff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JACOB BERNOFF, THOMAS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 10, 1944

Citations

54 N.E.2d 376 (N.Y. 1944)
54 N.E.2d 376

Citing Cases

People v. Bernoff, McAdam, Gabaeff, Taylor, Green

Motion by appellants Bernoff, McAdam, Green, Blume, Murphy, Gabaeff and Taylor for reargument denied. (See…

People ex Rel. Bernoff v. Jackson

In such a case the new sentence might, under certain situations, conform to the directions of the order of…