From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2002
292 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-04236

Argued February 1, 2002.

March 25, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered April 26, 2000, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, and intimidating a witness in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing (Rosengarten, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Glenn A. Garber, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, Noreen Healey, and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, and LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Given the number of times the complainant saw the defendant before the incidents in question and the highly charged and memorable nature of the incidents, his identification testimony of the defendant was confirmatory. Therefore, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony (see United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218; People v. Rodriguez, 79 N.Y.2d 445; People v. Won, 208 A.D.2d 393).

Furthermore, contrary to the defendant's contentions, the trial court's Batson rulings were proper (see Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79; People v. Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

PRUDENTI, P.J., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2002
292 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ARKEEM BENNETT, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

People v. Perkins

Indeed, such testimony established that the two had engaged in sexual relations on several occasions, that…

People v. Perkins

Indeed, such testimony established that the two had engaged in sexual relations on several occasions, that…