From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bencosme

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 22, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant failed to move for dismissal of the indictment on speedy trial grounds and therefore any claim of error with respect thereto is unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, we find that the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bencosme

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Bencosme

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BIENVENIDO BENCOSME…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 221

Citing Cases

People v. St. Gelais

The defendant's claim that he was promised a certain sentence upon his plea of guilty is dehors the record…