From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 24, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

12-24-2014

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scott A. BELL, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed October 28, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Pressley, 116 A.D.3d 794, 983 N.Y.S.2d 322 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his claim that his sentence was excessive. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 24, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scott A. BELL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 24, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 1050
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 9008