From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1998
254 A.D.2d 44 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.).


Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied without a hearing. Defendant was afforded reasonable opportunity to present his contentions through his pro se written application and the additional application for the same relief submitted by his attorney. The minutes of the plea proceeding establish that the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, belying defendant's claims of inter alia, coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Montford, 134 A.D.2d 207, 208-209, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 1009).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1998
254 A.D.2d 44 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES BELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 44 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

People v. Austin

Moreover, the plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The defendant admitted that he was not…