From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 22, 1990
162 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 22, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, Jr., J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, defendant argues that the court erred in charging accessorial liability. That issue is unpreserved and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [a]). Nor do we find that defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel by his attorney's failure to object to the charge on accessorial liability (see generally, People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 798-799; see also, People v. Kimbrough, 155 A.D.2d 935, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 814).


Summaries of

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 22, 1990
162 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES BELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 204

Citing Cases

People v. Amin

That contention is without merit. There is no indication in this record that defendant "lacked a sufficient…