Opinion
November 21, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that expert testimony was improperly admitted is unpreserved for appellate review and there is no basis to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250).
The defendant's sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.