From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Beecham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 2003
2002-02836 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2003)

Opinion

2002-02836.

December 29, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barros, J.), imposed January 29, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Jonathan E. Rubin on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: HOWARD MILLER and WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Beecham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 2003
2002-02836 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Beecham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ROGER BEECHAM, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2003

Citations

2002-02836 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2003)