From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Becht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 13, 1990

Appeal from the Orleans County Court, Miles, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of driving while intoxicated as a felony, defendant contends that the proof was legally insufficient. We disagree. Contrary to defendant's argument, the proof was not wholly circumstantial and thus the moral certainty standard does not apply (see, People v. Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375, 380). Defendant himself testified that he was drunk, the results of the breathalyzer test were in evidence, and the arresting officer testified that defendant told him that he had been cruising and had stopped to relieve himself when his motorcycle tipped over. The proof was legally sufficient (see generally, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

We have examined defendant's remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking in merit.


Summaries of

People v. Becht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Becht

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BECHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 342

Citing Cases

People v. Milowski

Officer Wilinski testified that defendant told him at the scene that she had pulled over to the side of the…