From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Beaner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 29, 1995

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh and excessive does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 N.Y.2d 761; People v Saunders, 190 A.D.2d 1092, 1093, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1019).

The further contention of defendant that his sentence is illegal is without merit. Although County Court did not expressly state that the periods of six months' incarceration and five years' probation to which defendant was sentenced were to run concurrently, the period of probation runs concurrently with the period of imprisonment by operation of law (see, Penal Law § 60.01 [d]).


Summaries of

People v. Beaner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Beaner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARVEL BEANER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 51

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or…

People v. Sattan

Under PL § 60.01[d], when a court imposes a split sentence "the sentence of imprisonment shall be a condition…