Opinion
572 KA 20-00849
06-30-2023
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ERIN A. TRESMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ERIN A. TRESMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree ( Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [a] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ; People v. Martin , 213 A.D.3d 1299, 1299-1300, 181 N.Y.S.3d 927 [4th Dept. 2023] ; People v. Gordon , 191 A.D.3d 1367, 1368, 140 N.Y.S.3d 662 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1120, 146 N.Y.S.3d 207, 169 N.E.3d 565 [2021] ). Nonetheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.