From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bazil

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 18, 2015
29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)

Opinion

No. 570460/13.

11-18-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Crawford BAZIL, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Anthony J. Ferrara, J.), rendered April 18, 2013, affirmed.

Defendant's present argument that the court should have made certain inquiries of the jury before granting a brief (five-day) adjournment to accommodate a key prosecution witness, is unpreserved for appellate review. Although defendant objected to the adjournment and requested a mistrial, he did not request that the court make any inquiry of the jury in connection with the adjournment (see People v. Knight, 84 AD3d 670, 671 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 860 [2011] ; People v. Webb, 60 AD3d 496, 497 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 800 [2009] ). We also decline to review the issue in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (see People v. Rosado, 125 AD3d 505, 506 [2015] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bazil

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 18, 2015
29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
Case details for

People v. Bazil

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Crawford BAZIL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 18, 2015

Citations

29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)