Opinion
07-01-2016
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reginald BAXTER, Defendant–Appellant.
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Janet C. Somes of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O'Brien of Counsel), for Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered February 13, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree (two counts).
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Janet C. Somes of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O'Brien of Counsel), for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ). Inasmuch as “ ‘defendant has completed serving the sentence imposed, his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe has been rendered moot’ ” (People v. Bald, 34 A.D.3d 1362, 1362, 823 N.Y.S.2d 741 ). To the extent that defendant contends that the duration of the order of protection is unduly harsh and severe, we conclude that his contention is without merit (see People v. Tate, 83 A.D.3d 1467, 1467, 919 N.Y.S.2d 919 ).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the judgment insofar as it imposed sentence is unanimously dismissed and the judgment is affirmed.
SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.