From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bautista

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 19, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7297 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 101

10-19-2017

The People & c., Respondent, v. Vilma Bautista, Appellant.

Nathan Z. Dershowitz, for appellant. Garrett A. Lynch, for respondent.


Nathan Z. Dershowitz, for appellant.

Garrett A. Lynch, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's remarks in summation, as they reflected arguments that were fairly inferable from the evidence adduced at trial. Further, we agree with the courts below that the notes taken during the interviews of an unindicted alleged coconspirator were not subject to disclosure under Brady v Maryland (373 US 83 [1963]) because, contrary to defendant's contention, the notes were not exculpatory as to defendant's convictions of criminal tax fraud in the first degree and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided October 19, 2017


Summaries of

People v. Bautista

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 19, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7297 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Bautista

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Vilma Bautista, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7297 (N.Y. 2017)