From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bautista

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Feb 27, 2008
No. H030337 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVE BAUTISTA, Defendant and Respondent. H030337 California Court of Appeal, Sixth District February 27, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CC077189

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 29, 2008, be modified as follows:

On page 16, immediately prior to the section labeled “Disposition,” add the following paragraph:

“In sum, Bautista II did not hold, as a matter of law, that there was a factual basis for a section 11360 offering-to-transport plea. The case merely concluded that the parties might have been able to establish such a basis. Since the trial court’s order dismissing the case was driven by a misunderstanding of Bautista II, the judgment must be reversed. That said, neither this opinion nor Bautista II limits the scope of any future plea negotiations. On remand, the matter shall stand as it did following the decision in Bautista II--Dave shall be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea and the parties may negotiate any lawful bargain they choose.”

There is no change in judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Premo, J., Elia, J., Rushing, P.J.


Summaries of

People v. Bautista

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Feb 27, 2008
No. H030337 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Bautista

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVE BAUTISTA, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Sixth District

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

No. H030337 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008)