In People v Baumann Sons Buses, Inc. (7 Misc 3d 128[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50488[U] [2005]), this court reversed a judgment of conviction on the ground that the accusatory instrument was facially insufficient to charge the defendant with violating section 35-3 (D) of the Islip Town Code, analogous to the instant section 35-3 (H) in that it governed noise.
Summary of this case from People v. Great Cove Mar., Inc.April 6, 2005.
Crimes — Information.
In People v Baumann Sons Buses, Inc. (7 Misc 3d 128[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50488[U] [2005]), this court reversed a judgment of conviction on the ground that the accusatory instrument was facially insufficient to charge the defendant with violating section 35-3 (D) of the Islip Town Code, analogous to the instant section 35-3 (H) in that it governed noise.
Summary of this case from People v. Great Cove Mar., Inc.Full title:PEOPLE v. BAUMANN SONS BUSES, INC
Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York
Date published: Apr 6, 2005
The instant appeal by the People ensued. In People v Baumann Sons Buses, Inc. ( 7 Misc 3d 128[A], 2005 NY…
People v. Baumann SonsThe Appellate Term (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County (James P.…