The assessment of these 30 points was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record, including the presentence investigation report and case summary, which revealed a prior youthful offender adjudication for robbery in the first degree (see People v Boynton, 186 A.D.3d 1729, 1730). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly assessed 30 points despite the fact that the youthful offender adjudication was for a nonsexual offense (see People v Sincerbeaux, 27 N.Y.3d 683, 689; People v Battle, 192 A.D.3d 1049, 1050).