From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Basono

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 25, 2014
122 A.D.3d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

11-25-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose BASONO, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Jonathan Garelick of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Jonathan Garelick of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Opinion Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O., at suppression hearing; Robert M. Stolz, J. at suppression decision; Daniel P. Conviser, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered August 9, 2011, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 ½ years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. An officer observed defendant and a group of others congregating with white foam cups and open bottles in their hands or nearby. Although the officer could not see the labels on the bottles, he was able to recognize them as liquor bottles. As the police approached, defendant and others attempted to cover the cups with their hands and kick away the bottles, and defendant fled. This pattern of behavior lacked any reasonable innocent explanation, and it provided reasonable cause to believe that defendant possessed an open container containing alcohol with the intent to consume it in public, in violation of the Open Container Law (Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 10–125[b] ). Accordingly, the police properly pursued defendant (see People v. Canty, 55 A.D.3d 330, 864 N.Y.S.2d 426 [1st Dept.2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 896, 873 N.Y.S.2d 272, 901 N.E.2d 766 [2008] ; People v. Bothwell, 261 A.D.2d 232, 234–35, 690 N.Y.S.2d 231 [1st Dept.1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1026, 697 N.Y.S.2d 585, 719 N.E.2d 946 [1999] ; Matter of Johnnie A., 253 A.D.2d 578, 679 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1st Dept.1998] ) and lawfully recovered the weapon he discarded during the chase.Although it is apparent from the record of the sentencing proceeding that the court did not believe that defendant was entitled to youthful offender treatment, it did not make the requisite explicit determination on the record at sentencing (see

People v. Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d 497, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 [2013] ; People v. Flores, 116 A.D.3d 644, 985 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept.2014] ; People v. Smith, 113 A.D.3d 453, 454, 979 N.Y.S.2d 26 [1st Dept.2014] ).


Summaries of

People v. Basono

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 25, 2014
122 A.D.3d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Basono

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose BASONO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
997 N.Y.S.2d 415
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8263

Citing Cases

People v. Zachary

The defendant's contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that the County Court should have…

People v. Walker

When accompanied by factors lacking reasonable innocent interpretation, the sight of open containers of…