Opinion
February 16, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's statement to a detective concerning the robbery was properly admitted at the trial. On this record, it cannot be concluded that the determination of the hearing court to credit the police officers' testimony over that of the defendant was erroneous.
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Santucci, J. P., Joy, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.