From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bartulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1946
271 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

December 16, 1946.

Appeal from County Court, Kings County.


Order affirmed. Defendant was indicted jointly with one D'Antonio. The indictment was based mainly upon D'Antonio's testimony before the Grand Jury, confessing his part in the crime and implicating the defendant therein. To supply the corroborative evidence required by section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the People introduced independent testimony that the defendant was seen on the street in the company of an unidentified man in the early morning of the day on which the crime was discovered, and in the vicinity of the parking lot in which the body was found. As a matter of law, such testimony in and of itself was insufficient to furnish the corroborative proof required by section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ( People v. Mullens, 292 N.Y. 408; People v. Kress, 284 N.Y. 452; 2 Wharton on Criminal Evidence [11th ed.], § 752.) Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bartulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1946
271 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

People v. Bartulis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOSEPH BARTULIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1946

Citations

271 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

On the basis of Adams' testimony it is equally plausible to infer that the appellant, as others in the crowd,…

People v. Armstrong

As to the other defendant the only evidence produced, other than the accomplice, was that he was a passenger…