From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 1, 2007
478 Mich. 875 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

No. 133128.

June 1, 2007.

Court of Appeals No. 261382.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal.

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument the parties shall address whether this Court should overrule People v Burton, 433 Mich 268 (1989), which requires independent proof of a startling event before an out-of-court statement may be admitted as an excited utterance under MRE 803(2). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to files briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the questions presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

People v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 1, 2007
478 Mich. 875 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID CARL…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 1, 2007

Citations

478 Mich. 875 (Mich. 2007)
731 N.W.2d 767

Citing Cases

People v. Barrett

The prosecution sought leave to appeal in this Court, and we ordered oral argument on whether to grant the…