From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1998
254 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Eugene Oliver, Jr., J.).


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning reliability of identification testimony and credibility of witnesses, including the alibi witness.

We reject defendant's argument that the trial court lacked authority to reinstate the first-degree robbery count that had been dismissed at the request of the prosecutor during jury selection ( see, People v. Clarke, 203 A.D.2d 916, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 965). These actions caused no cognizable prejudice to defendant. Once reinstated, the court properly charged the lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree based on a reasonable view of the evidence.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Lerner P.J., Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Barnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1998
254 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENT BARNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 82

Citing Cases

People v. Daggett

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, felony…

People v. Clark

" Being so held for the action of a Grand Jury involves the filing of a felony complaint on which [the]…