From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1996
232 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 1, 1996.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.), rendered June 10, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree, and sentencing him to 3 years probation, commencing upon his release from prison for a prior unrelated conviction, unanimously modified, on the law, to commence the period of probation on June 10, 1994, the date of sentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Andrias, JJ.


Defendant correctly maintains, and the People concede, that the sentence violates Penal Law § 65.15 (1), which provides that a period of probation "commences on the day it is imposed". The sentence should be modified accordingly.


Summaries of

People v. Barnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1996
232 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES BARNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
647 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

People v. Zephrin

People v Zephrin, 54 AD3d 1066, affirmed. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Susan…

People v. Golden Springs Corp.

Penal Law § 65.15 (1) expressly states that "a period or additional period of conditional discharge commences…