From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 532
May 17, 1971
484 P.2d 1233 (Colo. 1971)

Opinion

No. 25156.

Decided May 17, 1971.

Interlocutory appeal by the People for review of trial court ruling which suppressed certain evidence seized pursuant to a search incident to the warrantless arrest of defendant.

Ruling Affirmed.

1. CRIMINAL EVIDENCEArresting Officer — Testimony — Smell — Marijuana — Glassy Eyed — Unnatural Gait — Trial Court — Motion to Suppress — Lack of Probable Cause — Proper. Where arresting officer testified that he smelled the odor of marijuana on defendant, noted that defendant's eyes had a glassy appearance and had observed that defendant's gait was unnatural, and that these observations were made in an outdoor parking lot, held, under the circumstances, trial judge did not act improperly in granting the motion to suppress; the evidence was not of such quality or character which would justify reviewing court in holding that its legal sufficiency precluded trial judge from granting the suppression motion.

Interlocutory Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Honorable Donald N. Pacheco, Judge.

Jarvis W. Seccombe, District Attorney, William O. Perry, Jr., Assistant, Leonard M. Chesler, Chief Deputy, Coleman M. Connolly, Deputy, for plaintiff-appellant.

Sonheim, Whitworth, and Helm, for defendant-appellee.


This is an interlocutory appeal brought by the People for review of a trial court ruling which suppressed certain evidence seized pursuant to a search incident to the warrantless arrest of defendant Ronald Barnes. We affirm the trial court ruling.

The defendant was charged with possession of marijuana which was found as the result of the search of his person. In his motion to suppress this marijuana as evidence, the defendant contends that his arrest was without probable cause and therefore the search incident thereto was invalid.

The trial court after hearing granted the motion to suppress on the finding that the arresting police officer would have had to speculate as to what crime, if any, the defendant was committing in the officer's presence.

On behalf of the People, the district attorney contends that the trial court erroneously granted this motion to suppress. It is claimed by the district attorney that the evidence presented at the hearing established, as a matter of law, that the police officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant. The premise for this contention is that the arresting police officer testified that he smelled the odor of marijuana on the defendant, noted that the defendant's eyes had a glassy appearance and had observed that the defendant's "gait was unnatural." These observations were made in an outdoors parking lot area adjacent to the Red Rocks Theater near Denver.

In our view, it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that even though the above itemized observations by a police officer might, in certain circumstances, be an adequate basis for a finding that probable cause existed for a defendant's arrest, the trial judge is not, as a matter of law, required to ascribe great weight to every item of testimony and every conclusion of a witness. It is fundamental that the trial court, as the judge of the facts, can give whatever weight it wishes to such testimony.

From the record in this case, it appears obvious to us that the trial court carefully appraised the evidence before it and made a ruling which was clearly within its prerogative. The evidence before the trial court in this case is not of that quality or character which would justify this court in holding that its legal sufficiency precludes the trial judge from granting this suppression motion.

Ruling affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 532
May 17, 1971
484 P.2d 1233 (Colo. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of Colorado v. Ronald K. Barnes

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.Page 532

Date published: May 17, 1971

Citations

484 P.2d 1233 (Colo. 1971)
484 P.2d 1233

Citing Cases

People v. Trujillo

To state it another way, the evidence before the trial court in this case is not of that quality or character…

People v. Huffman

The record here fails to disclose evidence of the quality and character necessary to demonstrate that the…