From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1998
247 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 9, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant was not entitled to sanctions for the People's failure to preserve certain tape recordings of phone calls made to the 911 police emergency phone number. Before the defendant requested them the tapes in question were destroyed pursuant to routine police procedure. Moreover, the defense was furnished with "Sprint" reports which reflected the statements made by the witnesses to the 911 operator. Under these circumstances, there is no evidence of bad faith by the prosecution ( see, People v. Johnson, 239 A.D.2d 361; People v. Pavon, 234 A.D.2d 82; People v. Hyde, 172 A.D.2d 305).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1998
247 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Barber

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID BARBER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 681

Citing Cases

People v. Shcherenkov

The type of sanction is left to the sound discretion of the court, after weighing prejudice to defendant…

People v. Barber

June 25, 2001. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…