From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Banty

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jan 2, 1935
3 Cal.App.2d 481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 1411.

January 2, 1935.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. Neal Chalmers, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Thomas J. Banty, in pro. per., for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Ralph H. Cowing, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Yolo County of a felony, to wit: Violation of an act entitled "An act to regulate sale, possession, distribution and use of habit-forming narcotic and other dangerous drugs and substances," and specifically with the possession of opium.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court November 20, 1934. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on January 2, 1935. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Banty

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jan 2, 1935
3 Cal.App.2d 481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

People v. Banty

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. THOMAS J. BANTY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Jan 2, 1935

Citations

3 Cal.App.2d 481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
39 P.2d 478