From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bannister

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2014
998 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Opinion

No. 570762/11.

09-22-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan BANNISTER, Defendant–Appellant.


Opinion

Judgment of conviction (Gerald Lebovits, J.), rendered September 21, 2011, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People now concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite “affirming showing” that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 [1969] ; People v. Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359 [2013] ). Inasmuch as defendant has served his sentence, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of ordering a new trial, a disposition unopposed by the People.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bannister

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2014
998 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
Case details for

People v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan BANNISTER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 22, 2014

Citations

998 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)